registry / @zuplo/editor / 1.0.39603386871
@zuplo/editor@1.0.39603386871
Local development editor for the Zuplo CLI
AI Security Review
scanned 14d ago · by lpm-firewall-aiThe manifest and inspected source support a local editor package with bundled editor and compiler tooling. Scanner indicators did not establish malicious behavior, and no attack surface was confirmed.
Static reason
High-risk behavior combination matched malicious policy.
Trigger
Importing the library or opening the editor invokes its exported editor and browser tooling.
Impact
No concrete harmful effect or attacker-controlled data transfer was established.
Mechanism
The manifest defines library exports without install hooks; inspected bundle excerpts show editor, compiler, and support logging behavior.
AI rationale
The manifest and inspected source support a local editor package with bundled editor and compiler tooling. Scanner indicators did not establish malicious behavior, and no attack surface was confirmed.
Decision evidence
public snapshotAI called this Clean at 83.0% confidence as Benign with medium false-positive risk.
Evidence for AI clean decision
- The manifest describes a local development editor, exports library entrypoints, and defines no install lifecycle hook.
- The browser bundle’s support logging is controlled by a local storage setting.
- The server bundle imports editor configuration and path safety helpers.
- The flagged worker contains TypeScript compiler built-in module names; its dynamic module support is consistent with compiler tooling.
- The flagged browser assets contain editor and JSON worker code; source searches found no tested bidi control characters in the CodeMirror bundle.
Evidence against
- Scanner hints flag dynamic loading, network references, and Unicode, but inspected excerpts point to editor/compiler tooling and did not establish a malicious behavior chain.
Behavioral surface
DynamicRequireEnvironmentVarsEvalFilesystemNetwork
HighEntropyStringsMinifiedPossibleObfuscation
Source & flagged code
5 flaggeddist/client/static/js/main-qL9GBAvf.jsView file
•stage = ast_semantic_analysis; reason = ast_path_work_budget_exceeded; limitedFiles = 1
High
Semantic Analysis Limited
A bounded semantic-analysis stage reached its safety limit; remaining detectors completed, but this package requires AI review.
dist/client/static/js/main-qL9GBAvf.jsView on unpkg9`+e.stack}}var pe=Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty,me=t.unstable_scheduleCallback,he=t.unstable_cancelCallback,ge=t.unstable_shouldYield,_e=t.unstable_requestPaint,ve=t.unstable_now...
L10: `).replace(cd,``)}function ud(e,t){return t=ld(t),ld(e)===t}function dd(e,t,n,r,a,o){switch(n){case`children`:typeof r==`string`?t===`body`||t===`textarea`&&r===``||zt(e,r):(typeof...
L11: `,``):String(n.body);return{path:t,submission:{formMethod:i,formAction:a,formEncType:n.formEncType,formData:void 0,json:void 0,text:e}}}else if(n.formEncType===`application/json`){...
Medium
Dynamic Require
Package source references dynamic require/import behavior.
dist/client/static/js/main-qL9GBAvf.jsView on unpkg · L9dist/client/static/js/codemirror-6ITIKbGP.js
Findings
1 Critical2 High5 Medium4 Low
CriticalTrojan Source Unicodedist/client/static/js/codemirror-6ITIKbGP.js
HighCross File Remote Execution Contextdist/client/static/ts.worker-DFduhuek.js
HighSemantic Analysis Limiteddist/client/static/js/main-qL9GBAvf.js
MediumDynamic Requiredist/client/static/js/main-qL9GBAvf.js
MediumNetwork
MediumEnvironment Vars
MediumOversized Source Filedist/client/static/ts.worker-DFduhuek.js
MediumStructural Risk Force Deep Review
LowEval
LowFilesystem
LowHigh Entropy Strings
LowUrl Strings
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to @zuplo/editor@1.0.39603386871.
See all versions of @zuplo/editor for other recorded verdicts.
- Review the evidence and your use of @zuplo/editor@1.0.39603386871 before allowing it. Restrict the permissions described in this report.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
Evidence last updated: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.