abuden220
Republished package
This report shows the evidence for abuden220@2.0.0. 3 of 4 known versions are blocked or flagged. The newest version, 0.0.1-security, is allowed. See all versions.
AI Security Review
scanned 3mo ago · by lpm-firewall-aiSource inspection confirms runtime remote-code loading and browser proxy/service-worker behavior, while no install-time Node execution exists. The hidden remote loader and obfuscated control path create a concrete malicious supply-chain payload.
Decision evidence
public snapshot- `index.html` executes remote `https://c.vipersfutbol.com/script.js` on page load.
- `assets/boot-CVPGRFHh.js` automatically registers `j6k3y8.js` as a service worker.
- The boot code routes proxy traffic through `wss://21baseballacademy.com/fairs/`.
- `ct1tl/csbzam.js` and `ct1tl/pap3do.js` proxy requests and persist proxied cookies.
- `assets/index-CJm_PfL2.js` and `assets/ChatPage-zoA8Z6RX.js` are deliberately obfuscated.
- `package.json` has no preinstall, install, postinstall, or prepare scripts.
- No Node filesystem, shell, or environment-harvesting code was confirmed.
- The service-worker/proxy components are browser-only and activate when the HTML app loads.
Source & flagged code
9 flagged · loading sourcePackage contains a critical-looking secret pattern.
assets/proxy-runtime-1NyFshf9.jsView on unpkg · L1AWS access key ID in assets/proxy-runtime-1NyFshf9.js
assets/proxy-runtime-1NyFshf9.jsView on unpkg · L1Findings
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to abuden220@2.0.0.
The versions list below shows the verdict for each recorded version.
- Avoid installing abuden220@2.0.0. Remove it from direct dependencies and check your lockfile for transitive copies.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
- If this version ran, investigate the affected machine and build environment. Rotate credentials it could access and rebuild from a trusted environment.
Evidence last updated: .
Source advisory published: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.