registry / agency-lang / 0.32.0
agency-lang@0.32.0
⚠ Under reviewThe Agency language
AI Security Review
scanned 12d ago · by lpm-firewall-aiThe inspected source resolves the highlighted execution and persistence signals as package features, with no concrete attack behavior found. The required clean citation set exceeds the 256 citation limit, so the package cannot be marked clean under this report’s coverage rules.
Static reason
One or more suspicious static signals were detected.; previous stored version diff introduced dangerous source
Trigger
The reviewed helpers run when called for project setup, schedule installation, or audio transcoding.
Impact
No confirmed compromise or unauthorized data transfer was identified.
Mechanism
The inspected code writes project or scheduler configuration and runs FFmpeg with audio-processing arguments; no malicious transfer or unauthorized mutation was identified.
AI rationale
The inspected source resolves the highlighted execution and persistence signals as package features, with no concrete attack behavior found. The required clean citation set exceeds the 256 citation limit, so the package cannot be marked clean under this report’s coverage rules.
Decision evidence
public snapshotAI called this Manual Review at 78.0% confidence as Unknown with medium false-positive risk.
AI review observations
- The manifest identifies the package and its CLI; the inspected script list has no install lifecycle hook.
- The LSP setup helper writes project configuration that registers the agency command for Agency files.
- The scheduler’s launchd backend writes a run script and service configuration when installing a schedule.
- The flagged FFmpeg code builds arguments to transcode audio input.
Evidence against
Behavioral surface
ChildProcessCryptoDynamicRequireEnvironmentVarsFilesystemNetworkShell
HighEntropyStringsTelemetryUrlStrings
Source & flagged code
6 flaggeddist/lib/optimize/optimizerModule.jsView file
32// eslint-disable-next-line no-restricted-syntax -- CLI-layer loading of a user artifact; the bundle path is only known at runtime
L33: const mod = await import(pathToFileURL(out).href);
L34: const factory = mod.default;
Medium
Dynamic Require
Package source references dynamic require/import behavior.
dist/lib/optimize/optimizerModule.jsView on unpkg · L32dist/lib/cli/schedule/backends/launchd.jsView file
1import { execFileSync } from "child_process";
L2: import * as fs from "fs";
...
L6: import renderPlist from "../../../templates/cli/schedule/plist.js";
L7: const PLIST_DIR = path.join(os.homedir(), "Library", "LaunchAgents");
L8: function plistPath(name) {
...
L64: agentDir: path.dirname(entry.agentFile),
L65: path: process.env.PATH ?? "/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin",
L66: home: os.homedir(),
...
L71: fs.mkdirSync(PLIST_DIR, { recursive: true });
L72: // Unload first if already loaded (launchctl load fails on already-loaded plists)
L73: if (fs.existsSync(dest)) {
Medium
Install Persistence
Source writes installer persistence such as shell profile or service configuration.
dist/lib/cli/schedule/backends/launchd.jsFindings
3 High6 Medium5 Low
HighSandbox Evasion Gated Capabilitydist/lib/stdlib/ffmpeg.js
HighSemantic Analysis Limiteddist/lib/cli/attach.js#virtual:normalized:round1
HighPrevious Version Dangerous Deltadist/lib/host/node/nodeSubprocess.js
MediumDynamic Requiredist/lib/optimize/optimizerModule.js
MediumNetwork
MediumEnvironment Vars
MediumInstall Persistencedist/lib/cli/schedule/backends/launchd.js
MediumShips Build Helperdist/lib/cli/mlxSpeechServer.py
MediumStructural Risk Force Deep Review
LowScripts Present
LowFilesystem
LowHigh Entropy Strings
LowTelemetry
LowUrl Strings
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to agency-lang@0.32.0.
See all versions of agency-lang for other recorded verdicts.
- Review the evidence and your use of agency-lang@0.32.0 before allowing it. Restrict the permissions described in this report.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
Evidence last updated: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.