agents-chat-cli@3.42.0
多智能体群聊工具 - 支持 OpenCode/Claude Code/Codex/pi 内核,微信风格聊天界面
AI Security Review
scanned 2mo ago · by lpm-firewall-aiThe package has a concrete unauthenticated web-shell exposure and automatically installs a third-party AI CLI during postinstall. Its functionality is largely transparent, so the source supports a high-risk warning rather than a malware conclusion.
Decision evidence
public snapshot- The manifest runs a postinstall hook automatically.
- The install hook invokes a kernel setup routine that globally installs a third-party AI CLI when none is detected.
- The HTTP server exposes an endpoint that writes request data directly to a persistent shell's standard input, with no authentication checks in that route.
- The server listens without an explicit loopback host restriction.
- Agent executions default to permission-bypassing or auto-approval modes.
- The global install is limited to a named package and can be disabled through an environment variable.
- The package contains no self-dependency, obfuscated payload, credential harvesting, or hard-coded exfiltration endpoint.
- The shell and agent features are consistent with the package's interactive agent-workbench functionality.
Source & flagged code
19 flagged · loading sourcePackage defines install-time lifecycle scripts.
package.jsonView on unpkgA bounded semantic-analysis stage reached its safety limit; remaining detectors completed, but this package requires AI review.
package.jsonView on unpkgInstall-time lifecycle script is not statically allowlisted and needs review.
package.jsonView on unpkgFindings
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to agents-chat-cli@3.42.0.
See all versions of agents-chat-cli for other recorded verdicts.
- Review the evidence and your use of agents-chat-cli@3.42.0 before allowing it. Restrict the permissions described in this report.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
Evidence last updated: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.