arcy.js@0.1.4
⚠ Under reviewARCY — the universal JavaScript utility for embedding an AI agent that talks to, learns from, and acts on behalf of your users.
Static Scan Results
scanned 2mo ago · by rust-scannerStatic analysis completed at 93.0% confidence. No malicious behavior was detected; 9 low-signal pattern(s) were surfaced and cleared.
Static reason
One or more suspicious static signals were detected.; previous stored version diff introduced dangerous source
Decision evidence
public snapshotBehavioral surface
ChildProcessNetwork
HighEntropyStringsMinifiedUrlStrings
Source & flagged code
3 flaggeddist/arcy.flow.fef131718e42.jsView file
2patternName = generic_password
severity = medium
line = 2
Medium
Secret Pattern
Package contains a possible secret pattern.
dist/arcy.flow.fef131718e42.jsView on unpkg · L2dist/picker-GPZ2GHB4.jsView file
•matchType = previous_version_dangerous_delta
matchedPackage = arcy.js@0.1.2
matchedIdentity = npm:YXJjeS5qcw:0.1.2
similarity = 0.654
summary = stored previous version shares package body but lacks this dangerous source file
High
Previous Version Dangerous Delta
This package version adds a dangerous source file absent from the previous stored version; route for source-aware review.
dist/picker-GPZ2GHB4.jsView on unpkgdist/flow-M7W3H3C5.jsView file
Findings
1 High4 Medium4 Low
HighPrevious Version Dangerous Deltadist/picker-GPZ2GHB4.js
MediumSecret Patterndist/arcy.flow.fef131718e42.js
MediumNetwork
MediumStructural Risk Force Deep Review
MediumSecret Patterndist/flow-M7W3H3C5.js
LowNon Install Lifecycle Scripts
LowScripts Present
LowHigh Entropy Strings
LowUrl Strings
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to arcy.js@0.1.4.
See all versions of arcy.js for other recorded verdicts.
- Review the evidence and your use of arcy.js@0.1.4 before allowing it. Restrict the permissions described in this report.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
Evidence last updated: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.