autotel-adapters@2.0.24
Framework adapters and composable DX helpers for autotel
AI Security Review
scanned 15d ago · by lpm-firewall-aiThe inspected manifest has no install lifecycle hook, and the flagged files show request logging and adapter lifecycle behavior. Static hints about environment variables and a new bundled file were not supported by inspected evidence of malicious behavior.
Decision evidence
public snapshot- package.json declares no install lifecycle hook; its scripts are build, development, checking, linting, testing, and cleanup commands.
- package.json depends on autotel and autotel-edge, consistent with its adapter package identity.
- dist/cloudflare.cjs derives request method, URL path, and request ID for logging enrichment.
- dist/integration-DfduKDZQ.cjs records request status, duration, path, method, and context for logger completion.
Source & flagged code
6 flagged · loading sourcePackage metadata claims a different repository identity while copied source loads a runtime dependency bridge.
dist/cloudflare.cjsView on unpkg · L3package.json depends on autotel and autotel-edge, consistent with its adapter package identity.
dist/cloudflare.cjsView on unpkg · L4Findings
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to autotel-adapters@2.0.24.
See all versions of autotel-adapters for other recorded verdicts.
- Review the evidence and your use of autotel-adapters@2.0.24 before allowing it. Restrict the permissions described in this report.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
Evidence last updated: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.