registry / brainsmatics / 1.2.0
brainsmatics@1.2.0
⚠ Under reviewbrainsmatics
Static Scan Results
scanned 1mo ago · by rust-scannerStatic analysis completed at 65.0% confidence. No malicious behavior was detected; 8 low-signal pattern(s) were surfaced and cleared.
Static reason
No blocking static signals were detected.
Decision evidence
public snapshotBehavioral surface
EnvironmentVarsNetwork
HighEntropyStringsMinifiedUrlStrings
Oversized source lightweight scan
dist/index-3692c7e0.mjs10.1 MB file, sampled 256 KB
EnvironmentVarsHighEntropyStringsUrlStringsfb.meu.ant.designwww.w3.org
dist/index-9104e490.js6.73 MB file, sampled 256 KB
EnvironmentVarsHighEntropyStringsMinifiedUrlStringsfb.meu.ant.designwww.w3.orgwww.zoomify.com
Source & flagged code
2 flagged · loading sourcedist/index-3692c7e0.mjsView file
•path = dist/index-3692c7e0.mjs
kind = oversized_source_file
sizeBytes = 10600885
magicHex = [redacted]
Medium
Oversized Source File
Package contains source files above the normal full-analysis size ceiling.
dist/index-3692c7e0.mjsView on unpkgdist/index-9104e490.jsView file
•stage = ast_semantic_analysis; reason = ast_path_work_budget_exceeded; limitedFiles = 2
High
Semantic Analysis Limited
A bounded semantic-analysis stage reached its safety limit; remaining detectors completed, but this package requires AI review.
dist/index-9104e490.jsView on unpkgFindings
1 High4 Medium3 Low
HighSemantic Analysis Limiteddist/index-9104e490.js
MediumNetwork
MediumEnvironment Vars
MediumOversized Source Filedist/index-3692c7e0.mjs
MediumStructural Risk Force Deep Review
LowScripts Present
LowHigh Entropy Strings
LowUrl Strings
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to brainsmatics@1.2.0.
See all versions of brainsmatics for other recorded verdicts.
- Review the evidence and your use of brainsmatics@1.2.0 before allowing it. Restrict the permissions described in this report.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
Evidence last updated: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.