registry / canvasxpress-cli / 67.7.0
canvasxpress-cli@67.7.0
Node program to run canvasXpress in the command line
Static Scan Results
scanned 2mo ago · by rust-scannerStatic analysis completed at 65.0% confidence. No malicious behavior was detected; 10 low-signal pattern(s) were surfaced and cleared.
Static reason
No blocking static signals were detected.
Decision evidence
public snapshotBehavioral surface
ChildProcessDynamicRequireEvalFilesystemNetwork
HighEntropyStringsMinifiedTelemetryUrlStrings
NoLicense
Oversized source lightweight scan
src/canvasXpress.js3.65 MB file, sampled 256 KB
NetworkChildProcessEvalHighEntropyStringsMinifiedTelemetryUrlStringsajax.googleapis.comwww.canvasxpress.org
Source & flagged code
3 flaggedsrc/canvasXpress.jsView file
26*/
L27: (function(b,a){if(typeof exports==="object"){a(exports)}else{(a((b.CanvasXpress=b.CanvasXpress||{})))}}(this,(function(){var a=(typeof CanvasXpress==="function")?CanvasXpress:null;...
L28: /*! @source http://purl.eligrey.com/github/Blob.js/blob/master/Blob.js */
Low
Eval
Package source references a known benign dynamic code generation pattern.
src/canvasXpress.jsView on unpkg · L26index.jsView file
1const minimist = require('minimist');
L2: const path = require('path');
Medium
package.jsonView file
•stage = ast_semantic_analysis; reason = ast_parse_error; limitedFiles = 2
Findings
1 High3 Medium6 Low
HighSemantic Analysis Limitedpackage.json
MediumDynamic Requireindex.js
MediumNetwork
MediumStructural Risk Force Deep Review
LowEvalsrc/canvasXpress.js
LowFilesystem
LowHigh Entropy Strings
LowTelemetry
LowUrl Strings
LowNo License
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to canvasxpress-cli@67.7.0.
See all versions of canvasxpress-cli for other recorded verdicts.
- Review the evidence and your use of canvasxpress-cli@67.7.0 before allowing it. Restrict the permissions described in this report.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
Evidence last updated: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.