chai-as-structured
This report shows the evidence for chai-as-structured@7.0.5, the only known version.
This package appears in our research on the fake chai plugin campaign, with how it works, the full package list and what to do if you installed it.
OpenSSF/OSV Malicious Advisory
imported 3mo ago · by OpenSSF/OSVOpenSSF/OSV advisory MAL-2026-10622 confirms this npm version as malicious.
Advisory
MAL-2026-10622
Source
OpenSSF Malicious Packages via OSV
Summary
Malicious code in chai-as-structured (npm)
Details
The package name evokes chai-as-promised but the shipped code presents itself as pino middleware. When the middleware factory in index.js is invoked, it spawns a detached node child process running lib/initializeCaller.js. That script constructs a fake process.env stub whose DEV_API_KEY, DEV_SECRET_KEY, and DEV_SECRET_VALUE fields are base64 blobs that decode to a URL and request headers pointing at https://tomato-brunhilda-40.tiiny.site/index.json (an anonymous file-hosting host). The response's cookie field is passed to new Function.constructor('require', response) with the host's require handed in, giving the fetched string full Node privileges. The base64 concealment, misleading DEV_API_KEY naming, detached child launch, and typosquat-style package name are consistent with intentional supply-chain attack tradecraft rather than any legitimate loader.
References
Source & flagged code
0 flagged · loading sourceNo flagged code excerpts are attached to this scan.
Findings
1 High
HighOsv Malicious Advisory
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to chai-as-structured@7.0.5.
The versions list below shows the verdict for each recorded version.
- Avoid installing chai-as-structured@7.0.5. Remove it from direct dependencies and check your lockfile for transitive copies.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
- If this version ran, investigate the affected machine and build environment. Rotate credentials it could access and rebuild from a trusted environment.
Evidence last updated: .
Source advisory published: .
This report uses published external intelligence. The advisory does not provide a separate source-code analysis for each listed version.
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.