chemx@26.10.4-1258
Chemical X Protocol: Private drop-in architecture starter kit and capsule generator
AI Security Review
scanned 11d ago · by lpm-firewall-aiThe active postinstall hook automatically registers chemx in project Cursor and VS Code configs and, when present, the user’s Antigravity config. This is unconsented mutation of multiple AI-agent control surfaces, so the package warrants a block.
Decision evidence
public snapshot- package.json runs cli/postinstall.js from its postinstall hook.
- The postinstall handler calls installAllMcpConfigs for the installing project without a consent check.
- The MCP installer writes project Cursor and VS Code configuration and adds a chemical-x server entry.
- The installer also updates Antigravity’s global MCP config when its config directory exists.
- The launcher integration’s test confirms project MCP configs are created; separate wizard code writes agent steering files.
- The registered server runs this package’s own MCP command; the inspected installer code shows no credential forwarding or direct network endpoint.
- The separate agent-steering wizard offers an interactive selection and a None option.
Source & flagged code
11 flagged · loading sourcePackage defines install-time lifecycle scripts.
package.jsonView on unpkgInstall-time lifecycle script is not statically allowlisted and needs review.
package.jsonView on unpkgPackage contains a critical-looking secret pattern.
cli/errors/errors.spec.jsView on unpkg · L27Findings
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to chemx@26.10.4-1258.
See all versions of chemx for other recorded verdicts.
- Avoid installing chemx@26.10.4-1258. Remove it from direct dependencies and check your lockfile for transitive copies.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
- If this version ran, investigate the affected machine and build environment. Rotate credentials it could access and rebuild from a trusted environment.
Evidence last updated: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.