create-pmos@0.469.0
Scaffold the PMOS portable kit — run the PMOS product-management workflow (initiative → lane-fit spec → contract → build → three gates, with work-type lanes for features, research, maintenance, incidents, and content) entirely inside your own repo, with a
AI Security Review
scanned 5d ago · by lpm-firewall-aiThe flagged behaviors have package-related explanations: the project-local agent settings change occurs through the scaffolding command, routing is limited to the local workspace endpoint, and the installer sends a GitHub token only to api.github.com. No lifecycle hook or malicious credential flow was identified.
Decision evidence
public snapshot- The package describes a bundled scaffolder; activating the GUI is an explicit opt-in that installs its native dependency.
- Cockpit settings are merged into the project’s .claude/settings.json by the CLI scaffolding flow, preserving existing values.
- The cockpit sends route requests only to the loopback URL supplied by the workspace; without that workspace URL, it sends no request.
- The installer uses GITHUB_TOKEN for a release lookup at api.github.com, its own service.
- The CLI can write agent configuration and link skills when the user runs it.
- The workspace uses a saved Anthropic key or ANTHROPIC_API_KEY for its own Claude API feature.
Source & flagged code
11 flaggedPackage contains a possible secret pattern.
workspace/premium-viewer-share-test.jsView on unpkg · L61Package source references child process execution.
bin/create-pmos.jsView on unpkg · L23Package source references shell execution.
bin/create-pmos.jsFindings
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to create-pmos@0.469.0.
See all versions of create-pmos for other recorded verdicts.
- Review the evidence and your use of create-pmos@0.469.0 before allowing it. Restrict the permissions described in this report.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
Evidence last updated: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.