create-pmos@0.517.0
Scaffold the PMOS portable kit — run the PMOS product-management workflow (initiative → lane-fit spec → contract → build → three gates, with work-type lanes for features, research, maintenance, incidents, and content) entirely inside your own repo, with a
AI Security Review
scanned 22h ago · by lpm-firewall-aiThe reviewed behavior matches a scaffolding CLI with an optional local workspace. Prompt routing is limited to the workspace loopback endpoint and is enabled only by an explicit user command; the credential-related GitHub helper serves a repository-selected login to GitHub.
Decision evidence
public snapshot- The manifest describes a scaffolder and exposes bin/create-pmos.js as its CLI.
- The CLI copies the bundled kit only when the user runs the vendor command and the target does not already exist.
- Cockpit model routing accepts only a PMOS workspace loopback URL.
- Routing is off until the user types /pmos-route on; it routes eligible prompts only while enabled.
- The GitHub credential helper is limited to HTTPS GitHub origins and a login chosen for that repository.
- When routing is enabled, eligible prompt text and the repository root are sent to the local PMOS workspace.
- The CLI can register its own cockpit mod in project Claude settings and link kit skills under .claude/skills.
Source & flagged code
25 flaggedPackage contains a possible secret pattern.
workspace/premium-viewer-share-test.jsView on unpkg · L61Package source references child process execution.
bin/create-pmos.jsView on unpkg · L23Package source references shell execution.
bin/create-pmos.jsFindings
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to create-pmos@0.517.0.
See all versions of create-pmos for other recorded verdicts.
- Review the evidence and your use of create-pmos@0.517.0 before allowing it. Restrict the permissions described in this report.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
Evidence last updated: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.