ct-answer-designer@1.1.5
Vue3工单组件库，包含PC端和移动端工单组件
AI Security Review
scanned 18d ago · by lpm-firewall-aiThe SDK contains an obfuscated, automatically activated transfer of page host and license data without an affirmative consent gate. The FormCreate API recipient is product-aligned and no credential transfer is shown, so this warrants a warning rather than a block.
Static reason
High-risk behavior combination matched malicious policy.
Trigger
Loading the SDK in an eligible browser environment.
Impact
The FormCreate API can receive page host and license identifiers without an explicit user action.
Mechanism
The bundle encodes the page host and license data, then sends them in an image request to an encoded FormCreate API URL on a randomized 10% of eligible loads.
AI rationale
The SDK contains an obfuscated, automatically activated transfer of page host and license data without an affirmative consent gate. The FormCreate API recipient is product-aligned and no credential transfer is shown, so this warrants a warning rather than a block.
Evidence
dist/ct-answer-designer-sdk.iife.js
Network endpoints1
api.form-create.com
Decision evidence
public snapshotAI called this Suspicious at 81.0% confidence as Dangerous Capability with medium false-positive risk.
Evidence for warning
- The package exposes the UMD bundle as its CommonJS entrypoint.
- The SDK bundle sends the current page host and FormCreate license data to an encoded FormCreate API endpoint on a randomized 10% of eligible loads.
- The beacon is gated by browser and script-host checks, but the inspected code shows no affirmative user consent check.
Evidence against
- The recipient is the FormCreate API, matching a bundled FormCreate product component.
- The observed payload contains host and license data; this code does not show credential collection.
- The package’s prepublishOnly script builds the package and does not run an install-time hook.
Behavioral surface
EnvironmentVarsEvalFilesystemNetwork
HighEntropyStringsMinifiedPossibleObfuscationUrlStrings
Source & flagged code
6 flaggeddist/ct-answer-designer.umd.jsView file
563* @license MIT
L564: */function nk(e,t){var n=Object.keys(e);if(Object.getOwnPropertySymbols){var r=Object.getOwnPropertySymbols(e);t&&(r=r.filter(function(o){return Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptor(e,o...
L565: * @form-create/component-elm-select v3.2.31
High
Base64 Obscured Url
Source decodes a Base64-obscured HTTP endpoint at runtime.
dist/ct-answer-designer.umd.jsView on unpkg · L5631(function(xn,i){typeof exports=="object"&&typeof module<"u"?i(exports,require("vue"),require("element-plus"),require("axios"),require("vant")):typeof define=="function"&&define.amd...
L2: `),function(d){if(u=d.indexOf(":"),l=r.trim(d.substr(0,u)).toLowerCase(),s=r.trim(d.substr(u+1)),l){if(c[l]&&o.indexOf(l)>=0)return;c[l]=l==="set-cookie"?(c[l]?c[l]:[]).concat([s])...
L3: QueryAppInfoByAppID(appId: $appId, responseType: $responseType, redirectUrl: $redirectUrl) {
Low
Eval
Package source references a known benign dynamic code generation pattern.
dist/ct-answer-designer.umd.jsView on unpkg · L1dist/ct-answer-designer-wc.umd.jsView file
Findings
1 Critical3 High4 Medium6 Low
CriticalHardcoded Runtime Data Exfiltrationdist/ct-answer-designer-sdk.iife.js
HighSame File Env Network Executiondist/ct-answer-designer-wc.umd.js
HighBase64 Obscured Urldist/ct-answer-designer.umd.js
HighSemantic Analysis Limiteddist/ct-answer-designer-sdk.es.js
MediumNetwork
MediumEnvironment Vars
MediumOversized Source Filedist/ct-answer-designer.es.js
MediumStructural Risk Force Deep Review
LowNon Install Lifecycle Scripts
LowScripts Present
LowEvaldist/ct-answer-designer.umd.js
LowFilesystem
LowHigh Entropy Strings
Low
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to ct-answer-designer@1.1.5.
See all versions of ct-answer-designer for other recorded verdicts.
- Review the evidence and your use of ct-answer-designer@1.1.5 before allowing it. Restrict the permissions described in this report.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
Evidence last updated: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.