cutekitten-test@1.0.1
Security test package for a school project: its preinstall hook posts the installing machine's hostname and username to a Discord webhook to demonstrate npm lifecycle risks. Do not install unless you are testing this.
AI Security Review
scanned 4d ago · by lpm-firewall-aiThe manifest enables an install-time hook that sends the machine hostname and OS username to a hardcoded Discord webhook. The README discloses the behavior, but it runs automatically without installer consent, meeting the install-time data exfiltration rule.
Decision evidence
public snapshot- The package runs `node preinstall.js` automatically during installation.
- The hook reads the machine hostname and OS username, then POSTs them to a hardcoded Discord webhook.
- The README confirms the data sent and says the hook runs on install; disclosure does not make the transfer opt-in.
- The README identifies the package as a security demonstration and warns users not to install it unless they understand its behavior.
- The hook writes a local marker recording the event and request result.
Source & flagged code
7 flaggedPackage defines install-time lifecycle scripts.
package.jsonView on unpkgInstall-time lifecycle script is not statically allowlisted and needs review.
package.jsonView on unpkgFindings
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to cutekitten-test@1.0.1.
See all versions of cutekitten-test for other recorded verdicts.
- Avoid installing cutekitten-test@1.0.1. Remove it from direct dependencies and check your lockfile for transitive copies.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
- If this version ran, investigate the affected machine and build environment. Rotate credentials it could access and rebuild from a trusted environment.
Evidence last updated: .
Source advisory published: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.