devez-vibe@1.9.48
Stable terminal UI for Codex and Claude Agent SDK
AI Security Review
scanned 11d ago · by lpm-firewall-aiThe postinstall hook performs automatic first-party skill installation into Codex and Claude directories, which warrants a warning under the agent extension lifecycle policy. The inspected sources do not substantiate the scanner's remote control-hijack claim or a concrete malicious attack.
Decision evidence
public snapshot- The postinstall hook automatically runs the bundled skill installer during package installation.
- The installer targets Codex and Claude skill directories, copies bundled skills there, and prunes destination entries absent from the package copy.
- The flagged benchmark file defines ordinary public-site and bot-detection test targets.
- The launcher starts the selected executable and forwards the caller's arguments.
- The bridge exposes Claude permission updates through its request handler; the inspected setting path code does not show this bridge behavior being triggered by postinstall.
- The scanner-flagged benchmark is a test harness that invokes the search engine and records results; its listed targets include public sites and bot-detection test sandboxes.
- The agent setup copies package-bundled skills rather than fetching a remote skill channel.
Source & flagged code
7 flagged · loading sourcePackage defines install-time lifecycle scripts.
package.jsonView on unpkgInstall-time lifecycle script is not statically allowlisted and needs review.
package.jsonView on unpkgSource creates an unconsented AI-agent control surface through install-time mutation or a default unauthenticated remote skill channel.
Findings
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to devez-vibe@1.9.48.
See all versions of devez-vibe for other recorded verdicts.
- Review the evidence and your use of devez-vibe@1.9.48 before allowing it. Restrict the permissions described in this report.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
Evidence last updated: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.