hex-conv-ae7a
This report shows the evidence for hex-conv-ae7a@1.0.0, the only known version.
OpenSSF/OSV Malicious Advisory
imported 4mo ago · by OpenSSF/OSVOpenSSF/OSV advisory MAL-2026-6352 confirms this npm version as malicious.
Advisory
MAL-2026-6352
Source
OpenSSF Malicious Packages via OSV
Summary
Malicious code in hex-conv-ae7a (npm)
Details
The package's package.json declares a postinstall hook ("postinstall": "node run.js") that runs run.js automatically on npm install. run.js imports os, fs, http, https, and child_process and collects host identity and environment data including os.hostname(), os.userInfo(), os.platform(), process.env.USER, and process.cwd(), reads files from the filesystem (fs.readFileSync, fs.existsSync), base64-encodes payloads via Buffer.from(...).toString('base64'), and POSTs the result over http/https to a remote endpoint. This is the canonical install-time host-reconnaissance and exfiltration shape: a default `npm install` of this package automatically sends installer machine information off-host without any user interaction or documented purpose. The package name (hex-conv with a random hex suffix) is consistent with throwaway/disposable squatting infrastructure and the package has no legitimate library functionality matching this behavior.
References
Source & flagged code
0 flagged · loading sourceNo flagged code excerpts are attached to this scan.
Findings
1 High
HighOsv Malicious Advisory
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to hex-conv-ae7a@1.0.0.
The versions list below shows the verdict for each recorded version.
- Avoid installing hex-conv-ae7a@1.0.0. Remove it from direct dependencies and check your lockfile for transitive copies.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
- If this version ran, investigate the affected machine and build environment. Rotate credentials it could access and rebuild from a trusted environment.
Evidence last updated: .
Source advisory published: .
This report uses published external intelligence. The advisory does not provide a separate source-code analysis for each listed version.
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.