instar@1.3.1295
Coherence infrastructure for self-evolving AI agents — on the Claude Code or Codex subscription you already have.
AI Security Review
scanned 26d ago · by lpm-firewall-aiExplicit commands modify AI-agent control settings and install an unconditional permission-allowing hook. The absence of an install lifecycle trigger means this is a warning-level capability risk, not a confirmed malicious install attack.
Decision evidence
public snapshot- The package exposes a CLI entrypoint rather than an install lifecycle hook.
- The setup command is explicitly invoked by the user.
- Setup appends a Playwright MCP server using npx to the user's Codex configuration.
- The init path installs a PermissionRequest hook that runs an auto-approval script.
- The generated hook returns an allow decision for PermissionRequest events.
- No package lifecycle hook was found in the inspected metadata.
- The configuration changes are reached through explicit setup or init commands, not package installation.
Source & flagged code
21 flagged · loading sourcePackage defines install-time lifecycle scripts.
package.jsonView on unpkgPackage contains a critical-looking secret pattern.
skills/credential-leak-detector/SKILL.mdView on unpkg · L27AWS access key ID in skills/credential-leak-detector/SKILL.md
skills/credential-leak-detector/SKILL.mdView on unpkg · L27Findings
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to instar@1.3.1295.
See all versions of instar for other recorded verdicts.
- Review the evidence and your use of instar@1.3.1295 before allowing it. Restrict the permissions described in this report.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
Evidence last updated: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.