instar@1.3.1339
Coherence infrastructure for self-evolving AI agents — on the Claude Code or Codex subscription you already have.
AI Security Review
scanned 14d ago · by lpm-firewall-aiStatic hints identify several high-risk areas, but inspected source excerpts support ordinary package setup and Git verification behavior rather than a concrete attack. No confirmed attack surface was established.
Decision evidence
public snapshot- The install hook runs a native SQLite repair script, and prepare invokes Husky; no runtime self-dependency is declared in the inspected manifest excerpt.
- The required agent integration locations point to framework-specific setup, migration, server, test, and memory behavior; inspected excerpts do not establish an unconsented agent control-surface attack.
- GitSync describes and writes an allowed-signers file from active machine registry keys for Git verification.
- Post-update migration writes a Free Text Guard hook into Instar's hook directory.
Source & flagged code
18 flagged · loading sourcePackage defines install-time lifecycle scripts.
package.jsonView on unpkgPackage source references child process execution.
dist/threadline/PipeSessionSpawner.jsView on unpkg · L15Package source references shell execution.
Findings
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to instar@1.3.1339.
See all versions of instar for other recorded verdicts.
- Review the evidence and your use of instar@1.3.1339 before allowing it. Restrict the permissions described in this report.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
Evidence last updated: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.