instar@1.3.1381
Coherence infrastructure for self-evolving AI agents — on the Claude Code or Codex subscription you already have.
AI Security Review
scanned 4d ago · by lpm-firewall-aiSource inspection confirms server-triggered migration can install first-party hooks into an existing Claude project configuration without a separate confirmation at migration time. This warrants a warning for agent integration lifecycle risk; the reviewed credential and quota excerpts do not establish a separate attack.
Decision evidence
public snapshot- Starting the server runs a post-update migration that can add Instar hooks to Claude project settings and write the modified file without a separate migration-time confirmation.
- The migration skips this settings update when Claude Code is disabled or the project settings file is absent; the default enabled framework includes Claude Code.
- The package postinstall runs a local SQLite repair script. The inspected credential helpers read and write through the operating system keychain.
- QuotaManager’s reported operation is a quota recovery notification, not an unresolved account operation.
- The hook setup is part of Instar’s first-party project migration and is limited to Claude-enabled projects with an existing settings file.
- The inspected credential source and transport excerpts show local keychain access; they do not establish remote credential transfer.
Source & flagged code
18 flagged · loading sourcePackage defines install-time lifecycle scripts.
package.jsonView on unpkgPackage source references child process execution.
dist/threadline/PipeSessionSpawner.jsView on unpkg · L15Package source references shell execution.
Findings
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to instar@1.3.1381.
See all versions of instar for other recorded verdicts.
- Review the evidence and your use of instar@1.3.1381 before allowing it. Restrict the permissions described in this report.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
Evidence last updated: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.