instar@1.3.1418
⚠ Under reviewCoherence infrastructure for self-evolving AI agents — on the Claude Code or Codex subscription you already have.
AI Security Review
scanned 19h ago · by lpm-firewall-aiThe inspected excerpts did not verify the scanner’s credential-redirection claim or another concrete attack. A clean verdict requires citations for more distinct source paths than the output permits, so the remaining source coverage is unresolved.
Decision evidence
public snapshot- The package install hook invokes a native-module repair script that attempts a better-sqlite3 prebuild from the project’s GitHub release and can fall back to a source build.
- The inspected Telegram adapter constructs requests for api.telegram.org using the configured bot token; no unrelated credential recipient was confirmed in that excerpt.
- The source review did not cover the full set of files needed to support a clean verdict, and that citation set exceeds the output limit.
- The inspected excerpts do not establish credential redirection, persistence backdoors, or another concrete attack.
Source & flagged code
17 flagged · loading sourcePackage defines install-time lifecycle scripts.
package.jsonView on unpkgPackage source references child process execution.
dist/threadline/PipeSessionSpawner.jsView on unpkg · L15Package source references shell execution.
Findings
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to instar@1.3.1418.
See all versions of instar for other recorded verdicts.
- Review the evidence and your use of instar@1.3.1418 before allowing it. Restrict the permissions described in this report.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
Evidence last updated: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.