mountly@0.5.0
⚠ Under review**On-Demand Interactive UI Platform**
Static Scan Results
scanned 1mo ago · by rust-scannerStatic analysis completed at 65.0% confidence. No malicious behavior was detected; 9 low-signal pattern(s) were surfaced and cleared.
Static reason
No blocking static signals were detected.
Decision evidence
public snapshotBehavioral surface
DynamicRequireEvalFilesystemNetwork
HighEntropyStringsMinifiedUrlStrings
Source & flagged code
3 flagged · loading sourcedist/chunk-GYO7HLJU.jsView file
1var r;function i(){if(r)return r;try{r=new Function("specifier","return import(specifier);")}catch{r=e=>import(e)}return r}function n(e){return i()(e)}export{n as a};
L2: //# sourceMappingURL=chunk-GYO7HLJU.js.map
Medium
Dynamic Require
Package source references dynamic require/import behavior.
dist/chunk-GYO7HLJU.jsView on unpkg · L11var r;function i(){if(r)return r;try{r=new Function("specifier","return import(specifier);")}catch{r=e=>import(e)}return r}function n(e){return i()(e)}export{n as a};
L2: //# sourceMappingURL=chunk-GYO7HLJU.js.map
Low
Eval
Package source references a known benign dynamic code generation pattern.
dist/chunk-GYO7HLJU.jsView on unpkg · L1cli/commands/doctor.js#virtual:normalized:round1View file
•stage = ast_semantic_analysis; reason = ast_parse_error; limitedFiles = 2
High
Findings
1 High3 Medium5 Low
HighSemantic Analysis Limitedcli/commands/doctor.js#virtual:normalized:round1
MediumDynamic Requiredist/chunk-GYO7HLJU.js
MediumNetwork
MediumStructural Risk Force Deep Review
LowScripts Present
LowEvaldist/chunk-GYO7HLJU.js
LowFilesystem
LowHigh Entropy Strings
LowUrl Strings
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to mountly@0.5.0.
See all versions of mountly for other recorded verdicts.
- Review the evidence and your use of mountly@0.5.0 before allowing it. Restrict the permissions described in this report.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
Evidence last updated: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.