mui-wrapper-x-date-pickers@1.0.0
Benign security placeholder / dependency-confusion PoC, no functional code. See Moveworks bug bounty report.
AI Security Review
scanned 9d ago · by lpm-firewall-aiThe preinstall and postinstall hooks automatically transmit identifying environment details to a fixed external endpoint, with no consent guard in the source. The README's research-purpose claim does not establish installer consent, so this is a concrete installation-time disclosure.
Decision evidence
public snapshot- package.json defines a preinstall hook that sends the user name, hostname, and working directory to 38.242.235.206.
- package.json defines a postinstall hook that sends the same identifying data to 38.242.235.206.
- README.md confirms the install hooks send those identifiers; it does not establish installer consent.
- index.js exports an empty object and does not provide a functional date-picker API.
- README.md describes the install request as a bug-bounty proof of concept, but this description does not show that package installers consent to the disclosure.
Source & flagged code
7 flaggedInstall-time lifecycle script matches a deterministic static-gate block pattern.
package.jsonView on unpkgInstall-time lifecycle script matches a deterministic static-gate block pattern.
package.jsonView on unpkgPackage defines install-time lifecycle scripts.
package.jsonView on unpkgFindings
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to mui-wrapper-x-date-pickers@1.0.0.
See all versions of mui-wrapper-x-date-pickers for other recorded verdicts.
- Avoid installing mui-wrapper-x-date-pickers@1.0.0. Remove it from direct dependencies and check your lockfile for transitive copies.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
- If this version ran, investigate the affected machine and build environment. Rotate credentials it could access and rebuild from a trusted environment.
Evidence last updated: .
Source advisory published: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.