nebula-notebook@0.2.44
AI-native notebook computing environment — real Jupyter kernels, real filesystem, built to be driven by agents (Claude Code / Codex) via MCP
AI Security Review
scanned 2mo ago · by lpm-firewall-aiThe lifecycle hook is inert for normal registry installation, while the shell, SSH, filesystem, and network features are package-aligned runtime functionality. Static inspection found no exfiltration, remote payload execution, self-dependency chain, or unconsented install-time control-surface mutation.
Decision evidence
public snapshot- A postinstall hook is registered, but its source guards the published install path.
- The runtime includes local terminal and remote-agent capabilities.
- A startup update check contacts the npm registry.
- A large compiled frontend asset was statically flagged and inspected.
- The postinstall script exits when installed under node_modules, so it does not run its checkout-only npm install commands for consumers.
- The launcher only starts the bundled local server with user-supplied arguments.
- Protected API routes use authentication middleware.
- No self-dependency, hidden payload download, secret harvesting, or unconsented install-time mutation was found.
Source & flagged code
9 flaggedPackage defines install-time lifecycle scripts.
package.jsonView on unpkgInstall-time lifecycle script is not statically allowlisted and needs review.
package.jsonView on unpkgA bounded semantic-analysis stage reached its safety limit; remaining detectors completed, but this package requires AI review.
dist/assets/index-BnQLGXqd.jsView on unpkgFindings
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to nebula-notebook@0.2.44.
See all versions of nebula-notebook for other recorded verdicts.
- Review the evidence and your use of nebula-notebook@0.2.44 before allowing it. Restrict the permissions described in this report.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
Evidence last updated: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.