opencode-skills-collection@4.1.13
OpenSSF/OSV Malicious Advisory
imported 10h ago · by OpenSSF/OSVOpenSSF/OSV advisory MAL-2026-18193 confirms this npm version as malicious.
Independent LPM AI assessment
SuspiciousIndependent AI assessment: suspicious. LPM AI assessed this version as suspicious; the assessments disagree.
The startup skill synchronizer can delete unindexed directories within its user skill-library vault, creating a real agent-extension lifecycle risk. The manifest has no install hook, and the inspected startup path does not establish a malicious attack.
Independent scan evidence
public snapshot- The manifest defines only build, test, and prepublishOnly scripts; no install lifecycle hook is present.
- The plugin invokes its skill pipeline on OpenCode startup and targets the user’s skill-library vault.
- The vault installer removes skill directories absent from the bundled index, then copies bundled skills into the vault.
- The inspected startup path performs local skill-file synchronization; no network request or credential transfer is shown in the cited code.
Source & flagged code
13 flagged · loading sourcePackage contains a high-severity secret pattern.
bundled-skills/developer-signup-flow/SKILL.mdView on unpkg · L165Stripe test secret key in bundled-skills/developer-signup-flow/SKILL.md
bundled-skills/developer-signup-flow/SKILL.mdView on unpkg · L165Findings
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to opencode-skills-collection@4.1.13.
See all versions of opencode-skills-collection for other recorded verdicts.
- Avoid installing opencode-skills-collection@4.1.13. Remove it from direct dependencies and check your lockfile for transitive copies.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
- If this version ran, investigate the affected machine and build environment. Rotate credentials it could access and rebuild from a trusted environment.
Evidence last updated: .
Source advisory published: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.