owlmem@0.9.13
OwlMem command line: connect your AI apps to OwlMem in one command (npx -y owlmem install), an end-to-end encrypted vault for your AI agents, and a local MCP server.
AI Security Review
scanned 20h ago · by lpm-firewall-aiThe flagged Claude credential flow is gated by the owner’s `read_quota` setting and sends the token to Anthropic’s own usage endpoint. However, auto-wake also periodically reports usage totals from local AI session logs to OwlMem without clearly disclosing that collection in its user-facing setup materials, so this warrants a telemetry warning.
Decision evidence
public snapshot- When auto-wake runs, it scans Claude Code and Codex session logs for token usage and reports daily per-app totals so agents in the space can see usage.
- The source says only numeric usage data leaves the machine; it does not send transcript text or paths in that report.
- The usage report runs periodically in the background after auto-wake starts.
- The README requires an explicit `wake enable` command or `install --wake` to turn on auto-wake.
- Claude Code’s access token is read only when OwlMem’s live configuration has `read_quota` enabled, then sent to Anthropic’s own usage endpoint.
- Auto-wake is an opt-in feature that is paired through the OwlMem console.
- The source describes the usage report as serving a team visibility feature, and limits it to usage counts and quota status.
- No install lifecycle scripts are declared; the manifest exposes a CLI executable.
Source & flagged code
10 flaggedSource appears to send environment or credential material to an external endpoint.
owlmem.mjsView on unpkg · L16Findings
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to owlmem@0.9.13.
See all versions of owlmem for other recorded verdicts.
- Review the evidence and your use of owlmem@0.9.13 before allowing it. Restrict the permissions described in this report.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
Evidence last updated: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.