pennyrouter@0.2.32
Install and manage PennyRouter local coding-agent integrations.
AI Security Review
scanned 11d ago · by lpm-firewall-aiThe source implements user-invoked, first-party coding-agent integration setup, which warrants a warning under the agent configuration policy. The manifest has no install hook, and inspection found no concrete malicious behavior or unrelated credential recipient.
Decision evidence
public snapshot- The manifest exposes a CLI and has no install lifecycle hook, so these changes require a user to run the command.
- The runtime installer reads Claude Code settings and configures a statusline script.
- That script sends a session identifier and API key to the configured gateway’s statusline endpoint.
- The package registers its own MCP server for Claude Code and Codex; the inspected registration logic preserves entries it did not create.
- The flagged session-path locations identify local Claude Code and Codex session directories; the cited test locations show test fixture setup.
- The package describes itself as a coding-agent integration manager, consistent with its configuration behavior.
- The statusline request targets the PennyRouter gateway, and no unrelated credential recipient was identified.
- No source evidence showed unconsented install-hook mutation or a concrete attack chain.
Source & flagged code
6 flagged · loading sourceSource writes installer persistence such as shell profile or service configuration.
src/launch.test.jsView on unpkg · L28Source gates dangerous network, credential, or execution behavior behind CI, host, platform, time, or geo fingerprint checks.
Findings
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to pennyrouter@0.2.32.
See all versions of pennyrouter for other recorded verdicts.
- Review the evidence and your use of pennyrouter@0.2.32 before allowing it. Restrict the permissions described in this report.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
Evidence last updated: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.