postboi@0.15.0
<div align="center"> <img src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/postboi-mail/postboi/refs/heads/main/static/logo.svg" alt="Postboi" width="250" />
Static Scan Results
scanned 4mo ago · by rust-scannerStatic analysis completed at 93.0% confidence. No malicious behavior was detected; 11 low-signal pattern(s) were surfaced and cleared.
Static reason
No blocking static signals were detected.; previous stored version diff introduced dangerous source
Decision evidence
public snapshotBehavioral surface
ChildProcessCryptoDynamicRequireEnvironmentVarsFilesystemNetworkShell
HighEntropyStringsUrlStrings
NoLicense
Source & flagged code
2 flaggeddist/config.jsView file
85try {
L86: const { existsSync } = await import("node:fs");
L87: const path = await import("node:path");
Medium
Dynamic Require
Package source references dynamic require/import behavior.
dist/config.jsView on unpkg · L85dist/cli.jsView file
•matchType = previous_version_dangerous_delta
matchedPackage = postboi@0.14.2
matchedIdentity = npm:cG9zdGJvaQ:0.14.2
similarity = 0.897
summary = stored previous version shares package body but lacks this dangerous source file
High
Previous Version Dangerous Delta
This package version adds a dangerous source file absent from the previous stored version; route for source-aware review.
dist/cli.jsView on unpkgFindings
1 High4 Medium6 Low
HighPrevious Version Dangerous Deltadist/cli.js
MediumDynamic Requiredist/config.js
MediumNetwork
MediumEnvironment Vars
MediumStructural Risk Force Deep Review
LowNon Install Lifecycle Scripts
LowScripts Present
LowFilesystem
LowHigh Entropy Strings
LowUrl Strings
LowNo License
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to postboi@0.15.0.
See all versions of postboi for other recorded verdicts.
- Review the evidence and your use of postboi@0.15.0 before allowing it. Restrict the permissions described in this report.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
Evidence last updated: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.