psyclaw@0.30.9
A standalone, evidence-grounded social-science research agent with research contracts, evidence gates, and recoverable workflows
AI Security Review
scanned 27d ago · by lpm-firewall-aiSource inspection found no malicious behavior. Agent plugin setup is user-invoked and project-scoped, the high flagged Python file contains test fixtures, and provider auth files are read for provider discovery without an inspected forwarding path.
Decision evidence
public snapshot- package.json has no preinstall, install, or postinstall hook; its prepublishOnly hook runs branding and build checks.
- The Pi extension installs a recommended plugin only through its interactive plugin manager, into the current project, and then asks the user to reload it.
- The panel reads auth files to identify configured providers; the inspected code parses provider keys and values but shows no credential forwarding.
- User skill roots include project agent skill directories, consistent with the package’s skill-management behavior.
- The flagged conftest.py contains pytest fixtures and path helpers, not an executable payload.
- The TUI requires an explicit install confirmation, and panel plugin installation is wired to an invoked panel action.
Source & flagged code
6 flaggedPackage source references dynamic require/import behavior.
dist/apps/panel/observability.jsView on unpkg · L39Findings
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to psyclaw@0.30.9.
See all versions of psyclaw for other recorded verdicts.
- Review the evidence and your use of psyclaw@0.30.9 before allowing it. Restrict the permissions described in this report.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
Evidence last updated: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.