rally-project-brain-mcp@0.1.3
MCP server exposing Rally Project Brain to any MCP-compatible agent (Claude Code, Cursor, Copilot agent mode, Windsurf, ...)
AI Security Review
scanned 6d ago · by lpm-firewall-aiThe explicit login flow and Rally-aligned endpoint weigh against a malicious verdict. However, the setup also modifies agent instructions to encourage future sharing of task text and activity without a per-task consent check in the source, leaving a concrete agent capability risk.
Decision evidence
public snapshot- The command adds instructions to project agent files that direct future sessions to send the human’s request and work updates through Rally tools.
- Those instructions are added during login, which also writes project and user-level MCP configuration containing the token the user entered.
- The activity tool sends caller-provided summaries to the shared project feed through the configured backend.
- The manifest declares a command entry point but no install lifecycle script; configuration changes are behind the explicit login command.
- Login asks the user to enter a token and uses the configured Rally backend; the source does not show a hidden transfer to an unrelated recipient.
Source & flagged code
6 flagged · loading sourceManifest-trigger-reachable source writes behavior-bearing configuration into a user or project AI-agent control surface.
index.mjsView on unpkgThose instructions are added during login, which also writes project and user-level MCP configuration containing the token the user entered.
index.mjsView on unpkg · L76Findings
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to rally-project-brain-mcp@0.1.3.
See all versions of rally-project-brain-mcp for other recorded verdicts.
- Review the evidence and your use of rally-project-brain-mcp@0.1.3 before allowing it. Restrict the permissions described in this report.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
Evidence last updated: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.