sf-i-events@1.0.1167
Superflows Navigation Component
AI Security Review
scanned 4d ago · by lpm-firewall-aiSource confirms that an interactive calendar action sends cookie-derived credentials to a fixed Lambda endpoint, but does not establish the endpoint’s ownership or service alignment. This unresolved recipient risk warrants a warning, not a block for confirmed credential theft.
Decision evidence
public snapshot- The calendar mapping back button invokes `fetchCalendar()`.
- `fetchCalendar()` sends the `email` and `accessToken` cookie values as Basic authorization to a fixed Lambda URL.
- The shared request helper forwards that authorization in an HTTP request header.
- The manifest has no install lifecycle hooks.
- The Lambda path is named for calendar scheduling, which may indicate a package-aligned backend; source alone does not establish who controls the endpoint.
- The flagged DOCX analysis shows an ordinary report template document, not an executable payload.
Source & flagged code
6 flagged · loading sourcePackage ships high-entropy non-source blobs.
dev/templates/table-template.docxView on unpkgPackage ships compressed or archive-like blobs.
dev/templates/table-template.docxView on unpkgPackage ships a nested archive or MCP bundle that was inventoried but not recursively analyzed.
dev/templates/table-template.docxView on unpkgFindings
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to sf-i-events@1.0.1167.
See all versions of sf-i-events for other recorded verdicts.
- Review the evidence and your use of sf-i-events@1.0.1167 before allowing it. Restrict the permissions described in this report.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
Evidence last updated: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.