registry / shakers-cli / 0.15.0
shakers-cli@0.15.0
⚠ Under reviewShakers AI usage & skills evaluator: a local-first CLI (`shakers` binary) plus a local MCP server. Commands: ai-usage (scan + classify your AI-tool setup, T0-T7), certify (certify Skills from your code), share (branded LinkedIn card).
Static Scan Results
scanned 20d ago · by rust-scannerStatic analysis completed at 72.0% confidence. No malicious behavior was detected; 15 low-signal pattern(s) were surfaced and cleared.
Static reason
One or more suspicious static signals were detected.
Decision evidence
public snapshotBehavioral surface
ChildProcessCryptoDynamicRequireEnvironmentVarsFilesystemNetwork
HighEntropyStringsMinifiedPossibleObfuscationUrlStrings
NoLicense
Source & flagged code
7 flaggedsrc/mcp-auth-form.jsView file
23patternName = generic_password
severity = medium
line = 23
Medium
40patternName = generic_password
severity = medium
line = 40
Medium
57patternName = generic_password
severity = medium
line = 57
Medium
74patternName = generic_password
severity = medium
line = 74
Medium
Secret Pattern
Hardcoded password in src/mcp-auth-form.js
Findings
1 High8 Medium6 Low
HighSemantic Analysis Limitedbin/mcp.js#virtual:normalized:round1
MediumSecret Patternsrc/mcp-auth-form.js
MediumDynamic Requirebin/alma.js
MediumNetwork
MediumEnvironment Vars
MediumStructural Risk Force Deep Review
MediumSecret Patternsrc/mcp-auth-form.js
MediumSecret Patternsrc/mcp-auth-form.js
MediumSecret Patternsrc/mcp-auth-form.js
LowScripts Present
LowWeak Cryptosrc/report-store.js
LowFilesystem
LowHigh Entropy Strings
LowUrl Strings
LowNo License
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to shakers-cli@0.15.0.
See all versions of shakers-cli for other recorded verdicts.
- Review the evidence and your use of shakers-cli@0.15.0 before allowing it. Restrict the permissions described in this report.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
Evidence last updated: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.