signalledger-diagnostics@2.0.6
A configurable, namespaced Animate.css integration for Tailwind CSS
OpenSSF/OSV Malicious Advisory
imported 3d ago · by OpenSSF/OSVOpenSSF/OSV advisory MAL-2026-18076 confirms this npm version as malicious.
Independent LPM AI assessment
Manual ReviewIndependent AI assessment: manual_review. LPM AI review remains unresolved.
The inspected package source shows a Tailwind CSS plugin with no install lifecycle hook, but it imports an unresolved runtime dependency that is called as a PostCSS plugin. The dependency's behavior cannot be verified from the available source, so the package requires manual review without evidence of an attack.
Independent scan evidence
public snapshot- package.json declares @aaron205whitmore/postcss-animate-utils as a runtime dependency.
- src/motion.js imports that dependency and calls it as a PostCSS plugin.
- The plugin builds animation styles through src/motion.js when Tailwind invokes its callback.
- The inspected package manifest contains no install lifecycle hook; its scripts are lint and test.
- The inspected plugin path uses the dependency to build and register CSS styles.
Source & flagged code
4 flagged · loading sourcepackage.json declares @aaron205whitmore/postcss-animate-utils as a runtime dependency.
package.jsonView on unpkg · L32src/motion.js imports that dependency and calls it as a PostCSS plugin.
src/motion.jsView on unpkg · L5Findings
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to signalledger-diagnostics@2.0.6.
See all versions of signalledger-diagnostics for other recorded verdicts.
- Avoid installing signalledger-diagnostics@2.0.6. Remove it from direct dependencies and check your lockfile for transitive copies.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
- If this version ran, investigate the affected machine and build environment. Rotate credentials it could access and rebuild from a trusted environment.
Evidence last updated: .
Source advisory published: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.