socket@1.8.3
CLI for Socket.dev
AI Security Review
scanned 21d ago · by lpm-firewall-aiThe source supports a user-invoked Socket CLI with no detected install-time behavior. The flagged dynamic code, registry authentication, and Maven archive have package-aligned uses, and no concrete attack behavior was found.
Decision evidence
public snapshot- package.json maps the package binaries to CLI wrappers; bin/cli.js launches the CLI with the caller’s arguments, and the inspected scripts are build and check tasks.
- dist/cli.js starts CLI command handling and telemetry when the CLI is run. Telemetry defaults to disabled, requires an organization configuration, and sends events only when the API-provided setting enables it.
- Telemetry context sanitizes command arguments, including redacting API-token values; the CLI sends enabled events through the organization telemetry API.
- The flagged registry code attaches authorization only when registry request auth is present; it sends the request to its URI and notes that credentials for cross-host tarballs require alwaysAuth.
- The dynamic-code findings are in terminal capability formatting and generated schema validation code.
- The archive contains Maven extension classes; the CLI loads that extension only when its manifest-analysis path invokes Maven.
- No concrete attack behavior was identified in the inspected source; the flagged dynamic compilation, registry authentication, and archive have package-aligned CLI uses.
Source & flagged code
17 flaggedPackage source references dynamic code evaluation.
external/blessed/lib/tput.jsView on unpkg · L1152Findings
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to socket@1.8.3.
See all versions of socket for other recorded verdicts.
- Review the evidence and your use of socket@1.8.3 before allowing it. Restrict the permissions described in this report.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
Evidence last updated: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.