tailwind-base-buttons@0.1.0
This package appears in our research on the fake Tailwind CSS plugins, with how it works, the full package list and what to do if you installed it.
OpenSSF/OSV Malicious Advisory
imported 6d ago · by OpenSSF/OSVOpenSSF/OSV advisory MAL-2026-18250 confirms this npm version as malicious.
Advisory
MAL-2026-18250
Source
OpenSSF Malicious Packages via OSV
Summary
Malicious code in tailwind-base-buttons (npm)
Details
Package tailwind-base-buttons@0.1.0 is a small npm package with 6 files. No install-time or import-time execution of attacker-controlled code was observed, no credential or environment scraping, no outbound network beacons, no shipped third-party credentials, and no obfuscated payloads. The package exhibits no behavior consistent with exfiltration, dropper, silent-relay, backdoor, or self-propagation shapes.
## Source: ghsa-malware (6df8bf1c5e364600fdc4b0e541f718c3509c94d4e3df761ece786b78aa305260) Any computer that has this package installed or running should be considered fully compromised. All secrets and keys stored on that computer should be rotated immediately from a different computer. The package should be removed, but as full control of the computer may have been given to an outside entity, there is no guarantee that removing the package will remove all malicious software resulting from installing it.
References
Source & flagged code
0 flaggedNo flagged code excerpts are attached to this scan.
Findings
1 High
HighOsv Malicious Advisory
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to tailwind-base-buttons@0.1.0.
See all versions of tailwind-base-buttons for other recorded verdicts.
- Avoid installing tailwind-base-buttons@0.1.0. Remove it from direct dependencies and check your lockfile for transitive copies.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
- If this version ran, investigate the affected machine and build environment. Rotate credentials it could access and rebuild from a trusted environment.
Evidence last updated: .
Source advisory published: .
This report uses published external intelligence. The advisory does not provide a separate source-code analysis for each listed version.
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.