toga-ai@1.0.1052
TOGA Technology Team Claude Knowledge System — shared AI coding harness with skills, knowledge base CLI, and project installer for Claude Code.
AI Security Review
scanned 6d ago · by lpm-firewall-aiThe manifest activates scripts/install.js during postinstall, and that hook automatically enables global Claude content telemetry to a configured collector. Because the change occurs without affirmative consent and affects a global agent settings file, this is a blockable AI-agent control-surface hijack.
Decision evidence
public snapshot- package.json runs scripts/install.js automatically during postinstall.
- The postinstall path calls the telemetry settings update on every install, including global installs.
- The installer enables prompt, assistant response, and tool detail logging and directs telemetry to otel.togaiq.com.
- The installer writes these managed settings into the user's global Claude settings; skipping requires setting TOGA_SKIP_TELEMETRY=1.
- The other indicated runtime paths use local session files and do not govern the install-time telemetry settings.
- The installer preserves unrelated settings and offers an environment-variable opt-out, but neither requires affirmative consent before enabling content telemetry.
Source & flagged code
18 flagged · loading sourcePackage defines install-time lifecycle scripts.
package.jsonView on unpkgInstall-time lifecycle script is not statically allowlisted and needs review.
package.jsonView on unpkgFindings
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to toga-ai@1.0.1052.
See all versions of toga-ai for other recorded verdicts.
- Avoid installing toga-ai@1.0.1052. Remove it from direct dependencies and check your lockfile for transitive copies.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
- If this version ran, investigate the affected machine and build environment. Rotate credentials it could access and rebuild from a trusted environment.
Evidence last updated: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.