w-mousekey@1.0.41
OpenSSF/OSV Malicious Advisory
imported 10d ago · by OpenSSF/OSVOpenSSF/OSV advisory MAL-2026-18293 confirms this npm version as malicious.
Independent LPM AI assessment
Manual ReviewIndependent AI assessment: manual_review. LPM AI review remains unresolved.
The inspected package code exposes screenshot and mouse/keyboard functions, with no install hook in the manifest. Required native artifacts remain unsupported or only partially analyzed, so a clean verdict is not justified; no independent attack evidence supports a warning or block.
Independent scan evidence
public snapshot- The manifest points to the runtime bundle and declares no install lifecycle hook.
- The Windows screenshot helper launches the package's screen capture executable and reads its output; screenshot APIs call that helper.
- The AutoHotkey executable's offline analysis is incomplete and reports uninspected native call targets.
- The screenshot executable is a required native artifact whose behavior could not be inspected in the available analysis.
- The package manifest shows test and deploy scripts but no install hook.
- The screenshot helper is reached through the package's screenshot API, and the screenshot dependency selects platform-specific implementations.
Source & flagged code
6 flaggedPackage ships native binary artifacts.
_screenCapture/screenCapture_1.3.2.exeView on unpkgPackage ships non-JavaScript build or shell helper files.
_autoHotkey/Install.cmdView on unpkgFindings
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to w-mousekey@1.0.41.
See all versions of w-mousekey for other recorded verdicts.
- Avoid installing w-mousekey@1.0.41. Remove it from direct dependencies and check your lockfile for transitive copies.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
- If this version ran, investigate the affected machine and build environment. Rotate credentials it could access and rebuild from a trusted environment.
Evidence last updated: .
Source advisory published: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.