@caliperx2/components
Authorized security research placeholder - dependency confusion proof-of-concept. Not the real package. Will be unpublished after triage.
This report shows the evidence for @caliperx2/components@9999.0.0. 2 of 2 known versions are blocked or flagged. See all versions.
This package appears in our research on the dependency confusion probes at version 99 and above, with how it works, the full package list and what to do if you installed it.
AI Security Review
scanned 2mo ago · by lpm-firewall-aiThe package performs concrete, automatic collection and external transmission during preinstall. Its research-oriented claims do not establish consent for exfiltration in downstream installations.
Decision evidence
public snapshot- Installation automatically runs preinstall.js.
- The install hook collects the local username, hostname, working directory, install path, platform, Node version, and npm metadata.
- It encodes hostname and username into a DNS lookup and posts the collected JSON to two external destinations.
- The hook falls back from HTTPS to plain HTTP, increasing exposure of the collected data.
- The source does not read project files, spawn commands, or create persistence.
Source & flagged code
7 flagged · loading sourcePackage defines install-time lifecycle scripts.
package.jsonView on unpkgInstall-time lifecycle script is not statically allowlisted and needs review.
package.jsonView on unpkgFindings
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to @caliperx2/components@9999.0.0.
The versions list below shows the verdict for each recorded version.
- Avoid installing @caliperx2/components@9999.0.0. Remove it from direct dependencies and check your lockfile for transitive copies.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
- If this version ran, investigate the affected machine and build environment. Rotate credentials it could access and rebuild from a trusted environment.
Evidence last updated: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.