@carvana.authentication-flows/shared
This report shows the evidence for @carvana.authentication-flows/shared@19.2.1, the only known version.
OpenSSF/OSV Malicious Advisory
imported 4mo ago · by OpenSSF/OSVOpenSSF/OSV advisory MAL-2026-6521 confirms this npm version as malicious.
Advisory
MAL-2026-6521
Source
OpenSSF Malicious Packages via OSV
Summary
Malicious code in @carvana.authentication-flows/shared (npm)
Details
package.json declares a preinstall hook (`node index.js`) that runs unconditionally on `npm install`. index.js imports child_process/os/https, collects host identifiers (os.hostname, os.userInfo, platform, arch, homedir, cwd) and shells out to `whoami`/`id`, then POSTs the collected JSON to a hardcoded Burp Collaborator subdomain at https://pleq9pugrugzr4zgyymazmnq0h68u4it.oastify.com/detox56. The package name also impersonates the Carvana org by using a `.` in the scope (`@carvana.authentication-flows/shared`), making `carvana.authentication-flows` a fake top-level npm scope rather than a Carvana-owned namespace. There is no legitimate functionality shipped; the package's sole effect on install is reconnaissance exfiltration to an attacker-controlled out-of-band server.
References
Source & flagged code
0 flagged · loading sourceNo flagged code excerpts are attached to this scan.
Findings
1 High
HighOsv Malicious Advisory
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to @carvana.authentication-flows/shared@19.2.1.
The versions list below shows the verdict for each recorded version.
- Avoid installing @carvana.authentication-flows/shared@19.2.1. Remove it from direct dependencies and check your lockfile for transitive copies.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
- If this version ran, investigate the affected machine and build environment. Rotate credentials it could access and rebuild from a trusted environment.
Evidence last updated: .
Source advisory published: .
This report uses published external intelligence. The advisory does not provide a separate source-code analysis for each listed version.
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.