@channel_bot/xa0
This report shows the evidence for @channel_bot/xa0@9.9.99. 2 of 2 known versions are blocked or flagged. See all versions.
OpenSSF/OSV Malicious Advisory
imported 4mo ago · by OpenSSF/OSVOpenSSF/OSV advisory MAL-2026-3336 confirms this npm version as malicious.
Advisory
MAL-2026-3336
Source
OpenSSF Malicious Packages via OSV
Summary
Malicious code in @channel_bot/xa0 (npm)
Details
The package @channel_bot/xa0 was found to contain malicious code.
## Source: ossf-package-analysis (194976a861d5f77b7bfe921881d36c08ff7ced497269c62b1e55cfa0d63b7dca) The OpenSSF Package Analysis project identified '@channel_bot/xa0' @ 9.9.99 (npm) as malicious.
It is considered malicious because:
- The package executes one or more commands associated with malicious behavior.
References
Independent scan evidence
public snapshotBehavioral surface
ChildProcessNetwork
Source & flagged code
2 flagged · loading sourcepackage.jsonView file
•scripts.postinstall = node postinstall.js
High
Install Time Lifecycle Scripts
Package defines install-time lifecycle scripts.
package.jsonView on unpkg•scripts.postinstall = node postinstall.js
Medium
Ambiguous Install Lifecycle Script
Install-time lifecycle script is not statically allowlisted and needs review.
package.jsonView on unpkgFindings
1 High2 Medium1 Low
HighInstall Time Lifecycle Scriptspackage.json
MediumAmbiguous Install Lifecycle Scriptpackage.json
MediumNetwork
LowScripts Present
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to @channel_bot/xa0@9.9.99.
The versions list below shows the verdict for each recorded version.
- Avoid installing @channel_bot/xa0@9.9.99. Remove it from direct dependencies and check your lockfile for transitive copies.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
- If this version ran, investigate the affected machine and build environment. Rotate credentials it could access and rebuild from a trusted environment.
Evidence last updated: .
Source advisory published: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.