@coopeuch/config
Coordinated vulnerability disclosure proof of concept for a dependency confusion issue.
This report shows the evidence for @coopeuch/config@1.999.999. 1 of 3 known versions is blocked or flagged. The newest version, 0.0.1-security, is allowed. See all versions.
AI Security Review
scanned 11d ago · by lpm-firewall-aiThe source confirms an automatic install hook that collects identifying environment data and sends it to the maintainer's external collector without installer consent. The disclosed proof-of-concept purpose does not establish consent for this disclosure.
Decision evidence
public snapshot- The package runs postinstall.js automatically during installation.
- The hook assembles package, consumer, host, user, and environment identity data into a report.
- The hook posts the report to a publisher-selected external collector without a consent check.
- The hook invokes the send path unconditionally.
- The package describes the behavior as a coordinated disclosure proof of concept.
- The inspected hook does not show secret collection, shell execution, file writes, or persistence.
Source & flagged code
7 flagged · loading sourcePackage defines install-time lifecycle scripts.
package.jsonView on unpkgThe package runs postinstall.js automatically during installation.
package.jsonView on unpkg · L11Install-time lifecycle script is not statically allowlisted and needs review.
package.jsonView on unpkgFindings
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to @coopeuch/config@1.999.999.
The versions list below shows the verdict for each recorded version.
- Avoid installing @coopeuch/config@1.999.999. Remove it from direct dependencies and check your lockfile for transitive copies.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
- If this version ran, investigate the affected machine and build environment. Rotate credentials it could access and rebuild from a trusted environment.
Evidence last updated: .
Source advisory published: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.