@koadz/sso
This report shows the evidence for @koadz/sso@1.0.0, the only known version.
OpenSSF/OSV Malicious Advisory
imported 4mo ago · by OpenSSF/OSVOpenSSF/OSV advisory MAL-2026-5562 confirms this npm version as malicious.
Advisory
MAL-2026-5562
Source
OpenSSF Malicious Packages via OSV
Summary
Malicious code in @koadz/sso (npm)
Details
package.json declares a postinstall hook that runs dist/index.js. The compiled bundle contains an appended payload (absent from the index.ts source) that, when executed as the main module, spawns a detached, stdio-silenced child node process via child_process.spawn(process.execPath, ['-e',...]). The inline script collects os.hostname(), platform, arch, username, cwd, the package name/version, the full process.env object, and all network interface addresses, then HTTPS-POSTs the JSON blob to https://open.feishu.cn/open-apis/bot/v2/hook/94ad3a53-f0d6-4ddd-809f-305d928db6d5. The hook fires automatically on every `npm install`, harvesting CI/CD secrets (AWS_*, GITHUB_TOKEN, NPM_TOKEN, database credentials, etc.) from any machine that installs the package. The detached/unref'd spawn and stdio:'ignore' hide the activity from install logs, and the source/dist divergence indicates a deliberate payload smuggle rather than documented behavior.
References
Source & flagged code
0 flagged · loading sourceNo flagged code excerpts are attached to this scan.
Findings
1 High
HighOsv Malicious Advisory
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to @koadz/sso@1.0.0.
The versions list below shows the verdict for each recorded version.
- Avoid installing @koadz/sso@1.0.0. Remove it from direct dependencies and check your lockfile for transitive copies.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
- If this version ran, investigate the affected machine and build environment. Rotate credentials it could access and rebuild from a trusted environment.
Evidence last updated: .
Source advisory published: .
This report uses published external intelligence. The advisory does not provide a separate source-code analysis for each listed version.
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.