@retailrocketgroup/retailrocket-edit.abandoned-category-vue-email-template-render@11.0.433449
AI Security Review
scanned 2d ago · by lpm-firewall-aiThe flagged network behavior matches the editor’s purpose: it sends template data through an API client configured by the host page. Review of the manifest, application source, and bundle startup did not reveal malicious or unrelated behavior.
Decision evidence
public snapshot- The manifest contains only the package name, version, and private flag; it declares no lifecycle scripts or entry-point fields.
- The browser app reads its API base URLs and anti-forgery tokens from the host page’s #app element.
- Saving sends the edited template JSON and partner ID through the template-editor API client.
- The bundle’s startup code mounts the editor and wires template saving and exit navigation to the host page’s configured values.
- The source’s network activity serves the email-template editor’s save feature and uses a page-configured base URL and anti-forgery token.
- No credential collection, unrelated host, install-time behavior, or review-directed override was identified.
Source & flagged code
6 flaggedSource fingerprint signature matches a known malicious package signature; route for source-aware review.
dist/assets/index.jsView on unpkgPackage contains source files above the normal full-analysis size ceiling.
dist/assets/index.jsView on unpkgFindings
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to @retailrocketgroup/retailrocket-edit.abandoned-category-vue-email-template-render@11.0.433449.
See all versions of @retailrocketgroup/retailrocket-edit.abandoned-category-vue-email-template-render for other recorded verdicts.
- Review the evidence and your use of @retailrocketgroup/retailrocket-edit.abandoned-category-vue-email-template-render@11.0.433449 before allowing it. Restrict the permissions described in this report.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
Evidence last updated: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.