@retailrocketgroup/retailrocket-edit.abandoned-search-vue-email-template-render
This report shows the evidence for @retailrocketgroup/retailrocket-edit.abandoned-search-vue-email-template-render@11.0.433449. 1 of 13 known versions is blocked or flagged. See all versions.
AI Security Review
scanned 2d ago · by lpm-firewall-aiThe shipped page config directs a form containing the application’s anti-forgery token to an unrelated webhook collector when the reset action runs. This is credential disclosure to a foreign host and warrants blocking publication.
Decision evidence
public snapshot- The shipped index.html sets the reset form URL to https://webhook.site/a85a171c-bb86-4693-9552-d209a59a7e6a.
- The reset handler puts the configured anti-forgery form token into a POST to the configured reset URL and submits it.
- The reset handler is called by the return-to-template-selection callback.
- The manifest declares no lifecycle scripts, main entry, or exports.
- The editor’s save client uses a base URL supplied through page configuration.
Source & flagged code
5 flaggedSource fingerprint signature matches a known malicious package signature; route for source-aware review.
dist/assets/index.jsView on unpkgPackage contains source files above the normal full-analysis size ceiling.
dist/assets/index.jsView on unpkgFindings
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to @retailrocketgroup/retailrocket-edit.abandoned-search-vue-email-template-render@11.0.433449.
The versions list below shows the verdict for each recorded version.
- Avoid installing @retailrocketgroup/retailrocket-edit.abandoned-search-vue-email-template-render@11.0.433449. Remove it from direct dependencies and check your lockfile for transitive copies.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
- If this version ran, investigate the affected machine and build environment. Rotate credentials it could access and rebuild from a trusted environment.
Evidence last updated: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.