@rfdtech/components
Shared React component library for Clet projects
This report shows the evidence for @rfdtech/components@2.5.0. 7 of 9 known versions are blocked or flagged. See all versions.
AI Security Review
scanned 13d ago · by lpm-firewall-aiThe package performs unconsented AI-agent configuration and instruction-file writes through an install lifecycle hook. This meets the blocking policy for automatic lifecycle mutation of a broad AI-agent control surface.
Decision evidence
public snapshot- The package postinstall launches its setup CLI during installation, with an environment variable to skip setup.
- Setup unconditionally writes cross-tool instructions into the consumer project’s .ai directory.
- Detected tools also receive configuration or instruction-file changes; Codex setup can write to the user-level configuration file.
- The CLI routes the setup command to the installer that performs these writes.
- Tool-specific setup is conditional on detecting existing tool markers, and the postinstall supports an opt-out variable.
- The installer adds a package-specific MCP server entry and setup guidance.
Source & flagged code
5 flagged · loading sourcePackage defines install-time lifecycle scripts.
package.jsonView on unpkgInstall-time lifecycle script is not statically allowlisted and needs review.
package.jsonView on unpkgPackage source references dynamic require/import behavior.
dist/next.cjsView on unpkg · L1Findings
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to @rfdtech/components@2.5.0.
The versions list below shows the verdict for each recorded version.
- Avoid installing @rfdtech/components@2.5.0. Remove it from direct dependencies and check your lockfile for transitive copies.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
- If this version ran, investigate the affected machine and build environment. Rotate credentials it could access and rebuild from a trusted environment.
Evidence last updated: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.