@user-interface-common/common-styles
This package is for get the IP location and metadata
This report shows the evidence for @user-interface-common/common-styles@66.1.6. 1 of 2 known versions is blocked or flagged. See all versions.
AI Security Review
scanned 7d ago · by lpm-firewall-aiThe active preinstall request is unnecessary to install a common styles package and runs without user action, disclosing the installer’s network origin to a fixed recipient. The package’s stated lookup functionality does not establish consent for this automatic install-time request.
Decision evidence
public snapshot- The preinstall script automatically runs index.js during installation.
- index.js targets realwbx.com and requests location data for a supplied IP.
- The request uses a hardcoded authorization value and sends an HTTPS request.
- The entrypoint automatically looks up the fixed address 8.8.8.8 without a user action or consent check.
- The package describes IP lookup functionality and exports a lookup helper, but the install hook invokes a fixed example automatically.
Source & flagged code
7 flagged · loading sourcePackage defines install-time lifecycle scripts.
package.jsonView on unpkgThe preinstall script automatically runs index.js during installation.
package.jsonView on unpkg · L16index.js targets realwbx.com and requests location data for a supplied IP.
index.jsView on unpkg · L8Findings
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to @user-interface-common/common-styles@66.1.6.
The versions list below shows the verdict for each recorded version.
- Avoid installing @user-interface-common/common-styles@66.1.6. Remove it from direct dependencies and check your lockfile for transitive copies.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
- If this version ran, investigate the affected machine and build environment. Rotate credentials it could access and rebuild from a trusted environment.
Evidence last updated: .
Source advisory published: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.