@zzzgenesis00/solana-spl-token
This report shows the evidence for @zzzgenesis00/solana-spl-token@0.4.0, the only known version.
OpenSSF/OSV Malicious Advisory
imported 3mo ago · by OpenSSF/OSVOpenSSF/OSV advisory MAL-2026-12123 confirms this npm version as malicious.
Advisory
MAL-2026-12123
Source
OpenSSF Malicious Packages via OSV
Summary
Malicious code in @zzzgenesis00/solana-spl-token (npm)
Details
@zzzgenesis00/solana-spl-token@0.4.0 impersonates the Solana SPL Token package and runs postinstall.js on `npm install`. The script harvests host identity, reads ~/.ssh, ~/.npmrc, and ~/.gitconfig, probes Chrome/Firefox profiles and cryptocurrency wallet directories, and scrapes ~40 credential-shaped environment variables including NPM_TOKEN, NODE_AUTH_TOKEN, GITHUB_TOKEN, AWS_*, MNEMONIC, SEED_PHRASE, SOLANA_PRIVATE_KEY, and Helius/Infura/Alchemy API keys. It shells out via child_process.execSync to run `npm whoami` and `git config --global user.email`, capturing the installer's npm login identity alongside the stolen ~/.npmrc auth token. The collected JSON is exfiltrated over two channels: the Telegram Bot API (hardcoded bot token, chat_id) at api.telegram.org, and an HTTP POST to 40f955f39128bd79-178-249-214-24.serveousercontent.com/collect (a serveo tunnel). Execution is delayed with setTimeout and random jitter to obscure the beacon.
References
Source & flagged code
0 flagged · loading sourceNo flagged code excerpts are attached to this scan.
Findings
1 High
HighOsv Malicious Advisory
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to @zzzgenesis00/solana-spl-token@0.4.0.
The versions list below shows the verdict for each recorded version.
- Avoid installing @zzzgenesis00/solana-spl-token@0.4.0. Remove it from direct dependencies and check your lockfile for transitive copies.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
- If this version ran, investigate the affected machine and build environment. Rotate credentials it could access and rebuild from a trusted environment.
Evidence last updated: .
Source advisory published: .
This report uses published external intelligence. The advisory does not provide a separate source-code analysis for each listed version.
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.