abuden214
Republished package
This report shows the evidence for abuden214@2.0.0. 3 of 3 known versions are blocked or flagged. See all versions.
AI Security Review
scanned 3mo ago · by lpm-firewall-aiThis is not merely a scanner signal: the manifest points to `index.html`, which directly executes an arbitrary remote script. The remote execution is sufficient for a blocking malicious verdict despite the absence of npm lifecycle hooks.
Decision evidence
public snapshot- `index.html` auto-loads unsigned remote code from `https://c.vipersfutbol.com/script.js`.
- The remote script runs whenever the advertised HTML entrypoint is opened, before the local application module.
- `index.html` also loads `bfjdx/757lr8.js` and `ct1tl/pap3do.js`, bundled proxy/service-worker support.
- `j6k3y8.js` installs a fetch-intercepting service worker; `ct1tl/*.js` implements proxy routing and cookie handling.
- `assets/ChatPage-zoA8Z6RX.js` is heavily obfuscated and uses fetch/WebSocket networking, obscuring runtime behavior.
- `package.json` has no preinstall/install/postinstall lifecycle hooks.
- No Node child-process, environment-harvesting, or filesystem-write behavior was found in inspected entry files.
- Font and WASM blobs are consistent with the bundled web UI/proxy implementation rather than standalone payloads.
Source & flagged code
7 flagged · loading sourcePackage contains a critical-looking secret pattern.
assets/proxy-runtime-1NyFshf9.jsView on unpkg · L1AWS access key ID in assets/proxy-runtime-1NyFshf9.js
assets/proxy-runtime-1NyFshf9.jsView on unpkg · L1Findings
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to abuden214@2.0.0.
The versions list below shows the verdict for each recorded version.
- Avoid installing abuden214@2.0.0. Remove it from direct dependencies and check your lockfile for transitive copies.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
- If this version ran, investigate the affected machine and build environment. Rotate credentials it could access and rebuild from a trusted environment.
Evidence last updated: .
Source advisory published: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.