abuden24
Republished package
This report shows the evidence for abuden24@2.0.0. 3 of 4 known versions are blocked or flagged. The newest version, 0.0.1-security, is allowed. See all versions.
AI Security Review
scanned 3mo ago · by lpm-firewall-aiSource inspection confirms executable remote code loading and a persistent browser request-interception proxy tied to unrelated hosts. This is concrete harmful behavior despite the absence of npm lifecycle hooks.
Decision evidence
public snapshot- `index.html` loads and executes `https://c.vipersfutbol.com/script.js`.
- `assets/boot-CVPGRFHh.js` registers `j6k3y8.js` as a service worker.
- `assets/boot-CVPGRFHh.js` routes traffic through `wss://21baseballacademy.com/fairs/`.
- `ct1tl/jmqwjq.js` intercepts matching fetches and forwards URL, headers, and body.
- `assets/ChatPage-zoA8Z6RX.js` is heavily obfuscated and handles username/password/captcha requests.
- The manifest disguises this browser application as `abuden24` with only `index.html` as main.
- `package.json` has no lifecycle scripts.
- No Node filesystem, process, or child-process execution was found.
- The observed behavior activates when the packaged page is opened, not during npm install.
Source & flagged code
9 flagged · loading sourcePackage contains a critical-looking secret pattern.
assets/proxy-runtime-1NyFshf9.jsView on unpkg · L1AWS access key ID in assets/proxy-runtime-1NyFshf9.js
assets/proxy-runtime-1NyFshf9.jsView on unpkg · L1Findings
Affected versions and remediation
This report applies to abuden24@2.0.0.
The versions list below shows the verdict for each recorded version.
- Avoid installing abuden24@2.0.0. Remove it from direct dependencies and check your lockfile for transitive copies.
- Choose an independently verified alternative or release. This report does not establish that other versions are safe.
- If this version ran, investigate the affected machine and build environment. Rotate credentials it could access and rebuild from a trusted environment.
Evidence last updated: .
Source advisory published: .
Think this verdict is wrong? Dispute it on GitHub or read how reports are produced.